|

Our customers handle sensitive infrastructure data, personally identifiable information, and in some cases classified materials. If they cannot trust our security posture, nothing else we build matters. We did not bolt security on before an audit. We built it into the architecture from the beginning.

Why security matters for us

Nexma serves telecom operators, utility companies, government agencies, and defense organizations. These institutions operate under regulatory requirements and security expectations that are non-negotiable. A breach does not merely damage a brand. It compromises critical infrastructure, exposes operational intelligence, and erodes the institutional trust that takes years to build and moments to destroy. The Nexma team approaches security with the seriousness that this reality demands.

Current posture

Authentication is managed through enterprise-grade identity services with single sign-on support, multi-factor authentication, and session management. All data is encrypted in transit and at rest, with no unencrypted data paths. Access controls are role-based at the project and organization level, with audit logging for all data access. Infrastructure runs on hardened cloud services with DDoS protection, isolated execution environments, and defense-in-depth at every layer. Every component in the platform was selected with security as a primary criterion, not an afterthought.

SOC 2 roadmap

We are on a clear path to SOC 2 Type II certification. The controls are being implemented now — not as a compliance exercise conducted under deadline pressure, but because they represent the baseline of what enterprise customers should expect from any platform that handles their data. We will not ask customers to trust us on faith.

Responsible AI

The agent operates on customer data within a secure, isolated data environment. Customer data is never used to train models. AI outputs are deterministic where possible — backed by mathematical solvers — and transparent where not, with reasoning traces visible to the user. We do not ship opaque AI. And we hold ourselves to this standard because the domains we serve require explainability, not because a compliance framework demands it.